More servicesWindows Live
HomeHotmailSpacesOneCare
 
MSN
Sign in
 
 
Spaces home  Dichotomy - where I vent...ProfileFriendsBlogMore Tools Explore the Spaces community

Dichotomy - where I vent and rant when I'm blue, red, or even purple.

Kamran Zargahi

Things We Lose in Fire

 

People come in different flavors: smart, greedy, careless, benign, pretentious, incomprehensible, selfish, influential, compassionate, cold, amiable, iffy, flaky, fair, snappy, reasonable, boring, trustworthy. They come and go in waves and in different wavelengths. Though, there seem to be a very tiny set of individuals who leave you in a moral maze, forcing you to enrich your talent for survival, and teach you to cut and run from cut-and-run.

Trust as the main ingredient of friendship, evolves! By definition, trust is an act of reliance that establishes predictability in our interactions. Unfortunately, trust and its associated credit is highly fragile. There is this accepted notion that: it only takes one moment of doubtful encounter to fracture a trustworthy relationship, which is usually something that’s taken years to establish ... “Oh yeah, absolutely correct!” people respond to that notion. People even don’t blink to agree with such idea as if it’s a tenet. Well, it is not, it’s only a human behavior that’s become a mediocre norm. The rush to discredit is rooted in our insecurity and is more or less, a protective mechanism.

One of the most common patterns of breaking trust is when people get into heated arguments. We always lose things when there is fire. But, there are those teeny-tiny set of individuals who teach you lessons by being on the abnormal side of the norm. My late friend Hamid was one of them. He left us four years ago. There are many attributes and traits of his that could describe him, but certainly, the most intriguing and unique characteristic of his, was the fact that he was forgiving. So much so that, he never expected to predict his friends behaviors, but he trusted them anyway. He always put all the weight on himself, and never expected much from others. He was sincere, but perhaps, too sincere for his own good. His transition to the better place was our fire, and his presence was what we lost in that fire.

Hamid is now smiling. When someone smiles, it's a disconcerting cause for celebration …

Cheers,

Rife Tracks

It has become such repetitive theme and like a broken record. They listen to the music and ask “Who is this? Where can I get it from?”. So I decided to add another list to the blog on the top-right side and call it “Rife Tracks”. The name of the songs and artists are provided, and are clickable.

The idea was born based on the feedback from:

                                                                Shelli                 Rebecca

                                                                           Behnam          Tanya

                                                                     Aida           Lisa

Il Postino

Complexity kills! Except for, rejuvenating complexities of an artistic expression.

An article requires balanced choice of words, smooth flow, and relevance of sentences. A smart piece of writing includes internal references and an element of surprise - where the main message isn’t lost in all the innovative features. A perfect script is an awfully multifaceted and complex piece of art.

Visual arts go down as a sea of complexities all by their own merits. Involvement of three dimensional (and in some cases moving) objects, light patterns reflected from those objects, and creativity drawn in representation by means of lines and colors, are only a few aspects of a dreadfully convoluted process called visual arts.

Music is ultimately an expression of the feelings and inner-thoughts that can’t be verbally expressed. The process of composing music requires an initial structure, position of highs and lows, tempo, rhythm, and melody. All all of the above should be organized in time and on top of sonic qualities of texture and reverberation.

Combining script writing, visual arts, and music formulates cinema. Set aside, shooting, editing, and theatrical aptitude. It is by all means a complex process. The History of a Sign (original name: Historia de Un Letrero) is a six minutes short film presented in Cannes Film Festival. Every time you watch this short movie, there is something new to discover. The music (by Ennio Morricone), the message, focus on shoes, the beggar, and the flow of the story are all there to convey a message. It may move you to tears in the end, but the main story hides deep in the references of the film to Il Postino. Enjoy!

   

Highball Glassware

Webster defines the word “Perfect” as : not lacking or faulty in any particular. It implies the soundness and the excellence of every part, element, meeting all requirements, or quality of a thing frequently as an unattainable or theoretical state. Perfect is being complete of its kind and without defect or blemish.

There are many requirements to a perfect party. People, food, music, drinks, venue, time, … to call a few. And on top of all that, the art of harmonizing it all together to create good times. Now, why people would serve caviar in a paper plate is beyond me. To clarify, I don’t like caviar. It is too heavenly for guys like me – who dearly dig chicken wings and beer. But, I can’t help myself not thinking about the details and logic behind the decisions that led to the combination of “caviar” and “paper plate”. Most definitely, caviar is an expensive delicacy, so money hasn’t been an issue. It also makes people who provide it look upmarket and luxuriant. Caviar in a paper plate, leaves me with the only option of thinking that the host is both pretentious and lazy -- as s/he doesn't want to worry about the dishes afterward.

As I said, I really don’t care about caviar but I do take my drinks very seriously. No one can ever ask me to drink beer in a wine glass or a plastic cup. I refuse to do it. The whole concept is flawed by definition to say the least. If one wants to throw a perfect party, one needs at least four types of glassware:

1- Coupe : for short drinks

2- Double : for mixed drinks

3- Flute: for Champaign

4- Highball : for water, beer, or high ratio mix spirit

On a more serious note, the gap between “good” and “perfect” isn’t much. One flawed particular, qualification, or requirement is enough to make a perfect thing, a good one. This concept applies to every aspect of our lives, not just the parties.

Purple Beaches

The weather and the confluence of some events have made me focus on significance of several insignificant trends. Some individuals never fail to fascinate me, especially when it comes to their choices in social settings.

At times, people make choices in order to be perceived in certain way by design. But there are times when they just want to be comfortable, so the driving force behind the choice is their contentment. I, personally, find the former funnier than the latter – when things go wrong.

Either way, this is how I perceive you if you act in certain way:

 

  • Red Drinks - make you look like a guy who got divorced recently, and suddenly wants to socialize and look cool
  • White pants – make you look like captain Kirk when encountering future Starfleet officers
  • Sandals with Socks – it screams “Dork” and it makes you look like an Italian bus driver in Perugia. What I don’t get, though, is the point of wearing sandals is mainly to expose your feet to the fresh air. Don’t socks kind of defeat that purpose? If it’s too cold for bare skin, why the heck are you wearing sandals?
  • The Croc - it makes your foot look like a plastic hoof. How can anyone take a Croc-wearing man seriously?
  • Yellow Cars – make you look like the owner of a strip club called Purple Beaches
  • Cell Phone on a belt clip - Nothing says “Jackass” quite as well
  • Bicycle Shorts - let's face it; unless you're on a bicycle side-by-side with Lance Armstrong, there is no reason to ever wear bicycle shorts
  • Wife-beaters: If you want to dress as if you never got out of bed, just stay in bed

Be more amazed!

 

You, Me, and a Beer

 

It’s been a long time since my last posting. Generally, I write because writing allows me to be relentless. Through the process of writing, I can accurately unravel things and put them back together. That's a hazardous exercise. Like any other creative process, writing could be fragile because you’re always at the edge - trying to constantly reassess the danger-free zone. In that context, first hand experimentation of the things we write about, could be destructive in real life - because mystery could simply become confusion.

The fact is, I started posting my writings on this blog because I wanted some people to read them. In a mischievous way, I have been hoping that some people would read my postings more than others. Because, there has always been a real story behind everything I wrote. Except, I’ve been unfailingly faithful to "the code" of not mentioning names. Because, the discussion should always be about the problem and not about the people. Last weekend, I had a come-to-Jesus moment with myself. I thought I can't stop writing just because it takes a long time and great deal of energy to abstract problems away from people ...

... every good idea starts like a boutique. You do your thing in the corner, and you get noticed after a while. And then, the attention becomes a problem either by the virtue of perception, or by the state of preference. I know my writing style could be perceived as if I critique a great deal. But read my postings as if: it is just you, me, and a beer ...

Chronic Mistakes

 

There are so many favorable ways to learn lessons from your efforts in life, repeated mistakes is not one of them. Serial mistakes leave me finding that few things are more depressing and exasperating than making the same mistake, again. The fact is that we all love to repeat our mistakes - not because there is any doubt that the suggestion seems risky, but because one tends to "hope" that he will do it right the next time around.

 

The dynamic nature of human synergy provides a slippery setting, where the same mistakes are made without any awareness of the occurrence along the way. Characters swap, faces switch, and the tones of the language fiddle with what happens to make you feel cherished. Outside of the magical fairy tale land however, it is the same quagmire. People come around for certain things, and they apply different strategies to acquire them. Sadly, it is tantalizingly close to the end when you confront with the reality: you've made yet one more wrong judgment of the character and ability of another person.

 

Media shoves "hope" down our throats as a survival mechanism, or as a revolutionary idea to depression. But the fact of the matter is that no progress is made without pain. True, some mistakes worth making ... but, it's also true that prevention is better than correction. For me, chronic mistakes are an outdated idea. The unpredictable and dynamic nature of human interactions are no longer an excuse for my lack of diligence.

Submitting to a Shotgun Wedding

Seattle grows on you. The grumpy weather, everyone's tendency to cocoon, and of course the polite but distant Seattleites with the attitude of "have a nice day, somewhere else". The last one being the most interesting subject for me as it feeds my fussy and choosy tendencies.

Seattleites mostly commune through talking to coworkers or someone random - hoping the conversation will last beyond the third sentence. Women go to brunch or happy hours, with potential friends, being just like "Sex and the City" she'll be Charlotte, you'll be Carrie! Guys drink local hoppy beer with bitterness and aroma in the corner bars with wooden stools. "Seattle is like that popular girl in high school. The one who gets your vote for homecoming queen because she always smiles and says hello. But she doesn't know your name and doesn't care to".

In such city, if you're a product of your environment, the concept of friendship tips over to something new that's reminiscent of submitting to a shotgun wedding, rather than picking your suitor. In Seattle, friends are mostly of fellow transplants. They are very nice in passing situations, but beyond that there's a wall, and there is mistrust. In other cities or countries, there are people around you constantly. They come over and hang out and then they hang out some more. Those are the times you really get to know people and develop friendship.

Friendship is a byproduct of trust, awareness of feelings of others, and to a lesser extent: frequent interaction no matter how deep or meaningful. You can take the bar for friendship as high/low as you want, you can categorize people to friends, acquaintance, or best friends, and you can play with words as much as you want, but, there is value and a sense of appreciation in a familiar face. That's just human nature.

It leaves me all baffled about what friendship will look like in a few years in this carefree city. It seems like it's declining in quality, even though I now have a few hundred online friends who poke me everyday.

Indication of a Brain

The other day, I sat down with a friend to talk about a problem. While having a beer, I described the context, told the story, and explained my issues with some of the details of the story. I also rationalized that those issues bother me because they're fundamentally against my values. He listened to me for almost half an hour. I thought I actually did a pretty good job laying out my case - naively hoping, he would draw his own conclusions and that would help me get a balancing perspective on the issues. Instead, his response was "What doesn't kill you, make you stronger" and then silence ... I felt betrayed and was one second away from saying "no shit!" ... I was looking for the smallest indication of a brain on the other side.

Arguments and discussions, if carried out logically, are the most educating forms of communication. They usually include facts, premises, and assumptions. A logical and practical way of getting engaged in a discussion is to accept the facts, validate the assumptions, and embrace or argue against the premises. That'd be a meaningful discussion.

People have become so consumed and comfortable with empty expressions that add no value to the conversation. Hollow phrases and proverbs like "Life is short", "Everything happens for a reason", and "what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger" do not hold any logical or commonsensical significance in any discussion because they can be an answer to anything - without actually validating, embracing, or challenging any specifics. There is no doubt that the value of a story or discussion resides in its details. One feels heard and listened to when the listener reflects on the details of the narrative.

To make it a little more fun, let me actually prove that some of these proverbs are incomplete, inaccurate, and/or incorrect:

"Life is short" :
Whose life? How short is short? Two years or hundred years? Lack of what specification makes our lives short? If each of us could live two hundred years, would that be long enough? Is life short for having more fun, or is it short for collecting more knowledge? The fact is that life is not that short, it's not even relatively short in comparison with the life of a butterfly. The people who use this expression are the ones who want to make an excuse to be less thoughtful and more irresponsible.

"What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger" :
What does "strong" mean? Physical or mental strength? Are we only talking about physical death? How about emotional or mental death? Are people really stronger after massive emotional or mental declines? Heroin addiction doesn't immediately kill you, but while you're alive are you stronger because of it? Have you ever experienced or felt the prolong pain involved in loss of a child? Psychological and mental research of parents who have lost a child proves that they are less resilient and more vulnerable against emotional hardship. They are never emotionally stronger for the rest of their lives.

"Everything happens for a reason" :
Everything does not happen for "a reason". Everything happens for multiple reasons and that's the root of Einstein's relative theory. The challenge isn't to find out whether or not there are reasons. The challenge is to know the quantity and nature of those reasons and the direction thru which you can identify them. Individuals who believe in this proverb generally find themselves in hard situations. They tend to think there is a "good" reason behind a "bad" incident. The contrast of a "good thing" versus a "bad incident" that is presently in occurrence, makes them believe that something good will eventually happen in the future, and that is the prize of the current hardship. They're also comfortable not knowing what that "good thing" is, and of course always, "something good" will happen which somewhat relates to the "bad incident". This comforting connection justifies the relevance of this proverb. Most of the people who believe in this expression, also believe that we are all actors on a stage with predestined parts and scripts. Everything has been designed. Life is about finding the missing pieces, fixing the broken pieces, and getting rid of the pieces that don't fit. They are not adept to abstract thinking, they find huge comfort in black and white way of thinking.

Do I have Enough?

I have been asking myself some serious questions lately. Kind of keeping it real. No matter how strong your conviction are, if you have a touch of humility, you should suspect or at minimum reexamine your opinions and principles - every now and then. To keep myself in check, my personal rule has always been: if it takes you more than one minute to identify an asshole around you, then you are the asshole.

Keeping yourself in check is all about asking yourself uncompromising and hard questions. At times too much humility leads into letting others walk all over you in life. But what if one of your principles is to stay intellectually curious, socially selfless, and personally conscious!

One of the serious questions that has been swirling around my head is the question of "Do I have enough?". And by that I mean enough of everything. It's indeed a loaded question but if one can find the answer, then bliss will follow. The question at the core is: Enough compare to what or who? It is absolutely clear that comparison and difference is hidden beneath the question. It goes back to the same majestic belief of Human Beings Always Compare. They compare parallel or different things and weigh them for their claims to be greater. These comparisons take place in multiple ways and in association with multiple groups of people such as:

  - Inner Community: Family and Friend
  - Extended Community: Neighbors, High School friends, Coworkers, Childhood pals, ...
  - Some Sameness: Same city, Same Opinion, Same Hobby, Same Employer, ...

I venture to say that comparison with the first and last group is simply stupid and pointless. For instance, if I'm comparing my life with my brother and sister's, something else is profoundly wrong with my value system and life priorities. On the other hand, if I care to weigh myself against the people of the "same" category, then I have let myself down - because my life has become a pursuit of "approval of others".

I'm just thinking out loud here and the answer (if exists) seems to be getting complicated more and more ... I'm continuing to think and write about this. In the meantime, I ran into an interesting and relevant piece from Bob Sutton which states:

"... This attitude fuels a quest for constant improvement that has a big upside, leading to everything from more beautiful athletic and artistic performances, to more elegant and functional products, to better surgical procedures and medicines, to more effective and humane organizations. Yet when taken too far, this blend of constant dissatisfaction, unquenchable desires, and overbearing competitiveness can damage your mental health. It can lead you to treat those "below" you as inferior creatures who are worthy of your disdain and people "above" you who have more stuff and status as objects of envy and jealousy.
Again, a bit of framing can help. Tell yourself, "I have enough." Certainly, some people need more than they have, as many people on earth still need a safe place to live, enough good food to eat, and other necessities. But too many of us are never satisfied and feel constantly slighted, even though - by objective standards - we have all we need to live a good life. I got this idea from a lovely little poem that Kurt Vonnegut published in The New Yorker called "Joe Heller," which was about the author of the renowned World War II novel Catch 22. The poem describes a party that Heller and Vonnegut attended at a billionaire's house. Heller remarks to Vonnegut that he has something that the billionaire can never have, "The knowledge that I've got enough." These wise words provide a frame that can help you be at peace with yourself and to treat those around you with affection and respect ..."

See You Soon

Guys often read in magazines and hear from female friends that women obsessively analyze and look for hidden meanings in every casual utterance that men make, but men don't really believe it to be true. Such analysis actually scares men. For instance, when a guy dashes off "See You Soon" at the end of the conversation, the last thing in his mind is that such inconsequential note would end up being dissected in a therapy session - or discussed during three and half hours of conversation at the corner bar and over a glass of cheap rose.

The sad truth is that "see you soon" doesn't mean anything at all. It doesn't mean he likes you or he doesn't like you or even that he will see you soon, or he won't. It is a phrase that ends the conversation as meaningful as "later" or "best". It is a code to show that the message has ended. It might as well be "bye". It has no emotional or practical significance whatsoever. In that context, the true indicator of a guy's feelings is not what formula he chooses to close his letters with, but the fact that he hasn't called or emailed you. Men don't really require such fine analysis. You'll know it when a guy is asking you out, for instance. He will do it like "Would you like to have dinner with me?" or "You wanna grab a bite?" depending on who you choose to hang out with. This is as multi-layered as it gets with a half decent guy.

Human beings are obsessed with alleged reasons and pretext because such concepts provides them with means that could be comfortably and incorrectly perceived as wisdom or quality sense of judgment. The fact, however, is that alleged reasons remain to be as valid as prestidigitation or cold-reading!

My Next Life

I don't know the source if this piece but I found it interesting enough to post it on my blog.

"I want to live my next life backwards!

You start out dead and get that out of the way right off the bat. Then, you wake up in a nursing home feeling better every day. When you are kicked out of the home for being too healthy, you spend several years enjoying your retirement and collecting benefit checks. When you start work, you get a gold watch on your first day. You work 40 years or so, getting younger every day until pretty soon you're too young to work.

So then, you go to high school: play sports, date, drink, and party. As you get even younger, you become a kid again. You go to elementary school, play, and have no responsibilities. In a few years, you become a baby and everyone runs themselves ragged keeping you happy. You spend your last 9 months floating peacefully in luxury, spa-like conditions: central heating, room service on tap.

Until finally...you finish off as an orgasm."


Cinema Paradiso

I don't watch entertaining movies or shows. I have never watched Star Wars, or even one Episode of Seinfield which is not to say that they can't be entertaining. I've come to the conclusion that what's valuable for me is to set standards for what I choose to watch, not to just watch any popular film. Such choice is not an end point, it is a beginning point which decries the idea that entertainment is all there is in movies.

Movies could work as a form of entertainment, but fundamentally they don't. Because they sufficiently conform to the "pop culture", a trend I've strongly and passionately detested for such long time.

That being said, let me suggest some movies that provide a better idea as to what my point is:

- Smoking Aces, by: Joe Carnahan
- A Good Year, by: Ridley Scott
- Men at Work, by: Mani Haghighi
- Youth without Youth, by: Francis Ford Coppola
- Married Life, by: Ira Sacks
- Dancing with Shiva, by: Jonathan Demme
- When Did You Last See Your Father, by: Anand Tucker
- The Diving Bell and The Butterfly, by: Julian Schnabel
- The Witnesses, by: Andre Techine


Truth Paradox

Have you ever felt like life is mentally grueling on you? Sitting home whining and crying why me? Poor me! ... continuing on recalling every reason that justifies: you're the most miserable fuck in the history of mankind! You feel like you're coming back from your own funeral!

Back in 1991 when I was a student in university of Toronto, my quantum physics professor was Mr. Richards (he insisted on being called Mr. Richards) who was from Scotland. I loved his accent when I understood what the hell he was saying. I specially loved the way he would pronounce Time as "Tame" and at times asking "Whaar's yer boke?". He looked like a concerned fox who dressed for Star Wars convention. One day and in the middle of the semester, he expanded on twin paradox, in which a person who makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket will return home to find they have aged less than an identical twin brother who stayed on Earth. This experiment has been verified and is confirmed by many inventions around us.

On that day and after the twin paradox class, I stopped Mr. Richard in the hallway and impishly asked "Mr. Richards, which one of the two brothers is lying?". He replied "Neither, they're both correct in their own perspective". I continued by saying "it can't be, we know what the facts are and we know the measurements. "Oh yeah!?" he replied and continued "That's your perspective Kaam, and welcome to the world of many true and accurate perspectives, you young man". He then judiciously turned around and walked away thru the long hallway while was still staring straight thru my eyes and shaking his head that looked like a half crushed watermelon.

Now and after nearly sixteen years, I'm forced to remember that lesson every day. The truth is, we are unsure about the truth. Facts are subjective and depend on interpretation and perspective.

Miserable days come and go! The truth of the matter, if exists, always lies somewhere in the middle of the mess. A few things are for sure though, never believe in someone who talks about Life more than Love! Never listen to anyone who doesn't believe in truth paradox. Never trust anyone who presses on utter bliss.

Gum-Chewing Dismissal

 

A relationship can span from a work association to an intimate affair. The way people end a relationship reveals deep inside who they are! If someone can deal with the ending of something with the same level of care and gentleness as the beginning of it, that will speak to a deep seeded strength and profound consideration for things that don't necessarily benefit him or her.

Recently, I have been coming around a slew of narcissistic people with the same slapdash attitude towards surroundings and relationships. They believe in love at the first sight. They only fall in love with people who have already fallen in love with them. They end their relationships with complete ignorance toward the values they persist to necessitate ... those hypocrites with ample mastery in deception.

Nothing in this world can take the place of prudence and forethought. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Narcissistic and gum-chewing dismissal of people around us has never solved and will never solve the problems of the human race.


 

How Machiavellian Are You?

 

Do you think:

  - Most people are honest?
  - If you like someone, you should tell that person what s/he wants to hear?
  - The best way to earn someone's respect is to be kind and honest?
  - The best way to earn someone's loyalty is show him or her your power?
  - There are no absolute rights and wrongs. "Right" is what works?
  - Most people are extremely selfish?
  - A promise is a sacred trust?
  - Nice guys finish last?

The answers to these questions can disclose how Machiavellian you are! Machiavellian, the multifaceted propensity to deceive and manipulate others for your own gain.

"High Machs tend to take a more detached, calculating approach in their interaction with other people. They tend to believe most people are concerned only with their own well-being and to depend too much on anyone else is foolish. They believe some of the most efficient ways to achieve a goal are to use deception, rewards, promises, flattery, and even punishments to manipulate others into doing their bidding.

Low Machs tend to take a more personal, empathic approach in their interaction with other people. They tend to be more trusting of others and more honest. They believe humans are essentially good natured. At the extreme, low Machs tend to be passive, submissive, highly agreeable, dependent and socially inept; in contrast with those who are more Machiavellian, they have before also tend to believe that everyone has a good and bad side
"

Are you a low or high Mach? Come on! You have some Mach in you. Don't you?


eHarmony eMale

 

I'm usually fascinated by subjects that don't immediately urge me to place an opinion. Online dating is one of those ... a few weeks ago, I had dinner with an old friend and during our long conversation she said "I've put a profile on one of these dating sites and I go on a lot of dates with strange guys". For some unknown reason our conversation temporarily got to a tongue-tied place after that disclosure ...

... eating ...
... long silence ...
... eating more ...
... awkward silence again ...
... eating with vengeance ...
... not looking at each other, but continuing to eat ...
... heaving a sigh ...

"Why don't you say anything? You always have an opinion" said she! I really didn't know what to say. I had no opinion one way or the other! She continued by asking "Have you ever dated online?" ... "No" I replied and explained the reason by saying "it's difficult for women to know me after years in relationship, how could such motionless correspondence work for me? Besides, People use 'I' a lot and sometimes they pretend to be someone else, and ...". She didn't like what I said and passionately challenged me by saying "Why don't you try to write something honest about yourself that doesn't include 'I' too much?"

Ever since then, I have been thinking about that petite and clumsy interaction. Mainly, I've been trying to find the main reason behind the silence! I could be really straight forward with her, sadly, I had nothing to say. On the one hand, there are indeed some (on-the-surface) success stories. On the other hand, there are many reservations about meeting potential lovers online.

Love by concept, is highly circumstantial and contingent. They are few and far between, but there are people out there whose introductions reflect their personality in ways which are rare, fictitious, and unique. Filled with visual appeal and literary charm, they break preconceived molds allowing the world to get a glimpse of their matchlessness and substance. I still can't frame my mind around the subject despite the fact that there are not many things that make me happier than knowing one of my friends has found a committed lover.

That being said, I took my friend's challenge very seriously and tried to put something together if I ever had to introduce myself online. Here it is:

((   My name is Kamran, a man who bathes every day, believes in princesses, quality women, and other fantasy creatures - but fortunately, you don't have to kiss the frog to discover me. My understanding is that women often seem to be like phones: they like to be held and talked to, but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected. Willingness to share the remote, jumping on Opera's couch, and vacuuming the house are amongst my compromises -- when in a loving relationship. Giving gifts is an incomparable gesture for me, however, it is my belief that electrical appliances, cooking utensils, or lanterns are not adequate gifts for a lover. There is indeed a mischievous inner child in me. While opening the door for you, my inner child might tempt me to trip you on the way in. Like a dream job, excellent benefits will be paid by me but you have to pay taxes. I support you like your bra, tirelessly and as long as necessary, and you better show up at my soccer games and watch me yelling at and with 22 adult men. Last not least, if we end up in a relationship, I'm willing to lie about how we met! ))



The Big Man Theory of Life


In olden times when wishing still helped us, there was a man who had let go of the big-man-theory of life. He was startling, passionate, and impatient. His identity came from within and had nothing to do with what others thought of him. For him, the only measure of a person was: one's heart and instincts. He was gentle and keen on your emotional wounds - because he sincerely believed you learn from something that leads to a mess. He liked to live with the invisible people who pass by everyday, the ones who live in someone's heart -- not the ones in minds.

In the span of a lifetime, there are very limited number of events that have the command to make you think everyday, and by that, I mean every single day! If that's a flaw, my imperfection comes from my vivacious memories of all that I saw from him. I guess, if we're predestined to believe in some form of impartiality in life, I got mine from his friendship.

It is painful, and hard, to write about the loss of a cherished friend. Hamid Khaddad was just that!


 

The Tyranny of Conformity


"Conformity" implies a very interesting notion! It's one of those concepts that can serve many topics and make them seem flawed and perfect, both at the same time! "Conformity" keeps provoking controversy and divisiveness. There are lectures that speak about "Conformity Controversy" where the argument is that: conforming to personal values holds merit -- but social conformity, well, complicated!

Those who benefit most from normalcy and routine are naturally the most interested in stagnation, and they always try to seek allies in the traditional and established arrangements. Sometimes conformity is because of lack of courage. Many people suppress their ideas, hopes, and dreams because they're afraid to stand out and draw attention to themselves. Conformity always includes a threat of punishment if you fail to fit in, whether it comes from ridicule, being ignored by others, or direct confrontation.

In today's society, mainstream and pop culture are the forces of conformity. These elements vehemently spread and defend the notion of "more is better" -- whether "more" means more money, greater power, or better social status. Being who and what you are is the most natural thing there is. To suppress it, whether through fear, yielding to social norms, or lack of confidence in your own ability always leads to trouble. That's why millions of people today lead lives of frustration and desperation. They denied who they are in the hope that they would be rewarded by conforming to cushy social routines. Unexpectedly, their reward was mediocrity, depression and a nagging sense of hopelessness.

In such environment, a subgroup of conformists rebel out here and there - and want to be different. They call themselves non-conformists but they are just maladjusted to status quo. Outstanding thinkers and intellectuals are alike in two things: they're usually non-conformists on an epic scale, and they display a deep trust in the basic goodness, intelligence, and capacity for development of their fellow human beings.

In my view, conformity implies a fundamental mistrust of others. I believe there's a more fundamental power behind the urgency with which authoritarian popularity seeks to suppress individuality. That power is lack of trust.

" ... For as long as humans have existed, non-conformists have had a rough time! Society seems to need and fear non-conformists in equal measure. The forces of the status quo have always been strong. So when society forces you into a bland or acceptable mold, you naturally turn elsewhere to find an outlet to maintain your own uniqueness. For a very tiny group, that's what matters most! Only those with the courage openly to live their dreams can ever hope to find lasting satisfaction with their lives. After all, mediocrity and inner frustration are the true price of conforming ... "


Music & Me

Last Saturday, I pensively walked into the Silver Platters store in downtown Seattle hoping to find the new album from Keane. The place, which has zillions of CD racks, looks like the creepy warehouse in Sopranos where James Gandolfini (Soprano) and Tony Sirico (Paulie) go to whack one of Johnny Sack's guys.

In a bedazzled and trancelike moment, while listening to a groovy background song from Chris Rea, something surreal popped into my head. I thought, if music says things that words cannot, what are those things? They have to have something to do with our most intimate experiences and deepest feelings. Looking at the CD racks, I overdramatically thought how many hearts have been broken for these many track? Who betrayed who? Who lost a dear one? Who's had a thorny upbringing? Who's been mad, sad, or frustrated? Who's in love? Who fell out of love? Who's about to fall in love? Who's in pain as a result of others' pain?

Like every other aspects of our lives these things are hard to define. Love, hate, betrayal, deception, birth, infidelity, and loss of a dear one will introduce experiences of such effects - where one can only express his/her stance and posture thru the harmony of inner voices from a sea of possibilities. Music has a long pedigree of transforming individuals, I don't relate to people who take it absentmindedly!

Even Paulie liked good music.

View more entries